Security Digest · Vulnerability record

CVE-2024-42480: RBAC Roles for `etcd` created by Kamaji are not disjunct

Kamaji is the Hosted Control Plane Manager for Kubernetes.

CVSS 9.3 Critical EPSS 0.6% · p49

Should you act?

Critical and remotely reachable

No known exploitation yet, but it is network-reachable without credentials. This signal is computed from CISA KEV, EPSS and CVSS data; it is not an editorial verdict.

  • Not in CISA KEV, but CISA’s SSVC assessment records a public proof-of-concept, so attack code exists.
  • EPSS 0.6%, percentile 49: FIRST’s model estimates a 0.6% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 49% of all scored CVEs (low). EPSS is a probability, not a verdict.
  • Remotely reachable with no login and no user interaction. If the vulnerable service is exposed to the internet, prioritize it.
  • Only applies if your dependency tree includes github.com/clastix/kamaji (Go) <= 1.0.0, no fixed version listed. Check your lockfile, including transitive dependencies.

What it is

Kamaji is the Hosted Control Plane Manager for Kubernetes. In versions 1.0.0 and earlier, Kamaji uses an "open at the top" range definition in RBAC for etcd roles leading to some TCPs API servers being able to read, write, and delete the data of other control planes. This vulnerability is fixed in edge-24.8.2.

From the GitHub advisory

Summary Using an "open at the top" range definition in RBAC for etcd roles leads to some TCPs API servers being able to read, write and delete the data of other control planes.

Details

The problematic code is this: https://github.com/clastix/kamaji/blob/8cdc6191242f80d120c46b166e2102d27568225a/internal/datastore/etcd.go#L19-L24

The range created by this RBAC setup code looks like this:

The range end \0 means "everything that comes after" in etcd, so potentially all the key prefixes of controlplanes with a name that comes after "example" when sorting lexically (e.g. example1, examplf, all the way to zzzzzzz if you will).

Weakness type: CWE-284.

Product: github.com/clastix/kamaji (Go) · Assigned by: GitHub_M · Published: 2024-08-12

Affected and fixed versions

EcosystemPackageVulnerableFirst fixed
Gogithub.com/clastix/kamaji<= 1.0.0none listed
VendorProductAffected versions (per CVE record)
clastixkamaji<= 1.0.0

Severity scores

Scored byCVSSScoreVector
GitHub_M3.18.1 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
GitHub4.09.3 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
  • Attack vector: network (remotely reachable)
  • Attack complexity: low
  • Attack requirements: none
  • Privileges required: none (no login)
  • User interaction: none

CVSS measures how bad a flaw is if exploited, not how likely exploitation is. Read it next to the exploitation data below.

Exploitation and urgency

  • CISA KEV: not listed (no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation known to CISA).
  • CISA SSVC assessment: exploitation poc, automatable no, technical impact partial.
  • FIRST EPSS (model of 2026-10-21): 0.62% probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 49.

Timeline

  • — CVE record last updated
  • — CVE record published by GitHub_M
  • — GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-6r4j-4rjc-8vw5 published (critical)

Sources and references

Original sources first. Version and fix details should always be confirmed against the vendor or project advisory.

Vulnerability records

  1. GitHub Advisory GHSA-6r4j-4rjc-8vw5 github.com
  2. CVE.org record CVE-2024-42480 cve.org
  3. NVD entry CVE-2024-42480 nvd.nist.gov

Other references from the CVE record and advisory

  1. github.com github.com
  2. github.com github.com
  3. github.com github.com

Critical Go advisories · Today’s Security Digest