Security Digest · Vulnerability record

CVE-2024-8537: AgentScope path traversal vulnerability

A path traversal vulnerability exists in the modelscope/agentscope application, affecting all versions.

CVSS 9.1 Critical EPSS 1.0% · p64

Should you act?

Critical and remotely reachable

No known exploitation yet, but it is network-reachable without credentials. This signal is computed from CISA KEV, EPSS and CVSS data; it is not an editorial verdict.

  • Not in CISA KEV, but CISA’s SSVC assessment records a public proof-of-concept, so attack code exists.
  • EPSS 1.0%, percentile 64: FIRST’s model estimates a 1.0% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 64% of all scored CVEs (moderate). EPSS is a probability, not a verdict.
  • Remotely reachable with no login and no user interaction. If the vulnerable service is exposed to the internet, prioritize it.
  • Only applies if your dependency tree includes agentscope (PyPI) <= 0.1.1, no fixed version listed. Check your lockfile, including transitive dependencies.

What it is

A path traversal vulnerability exists in the modelscope/agentscope application, affecting all versions. The vulnerability is present in the /delete-workflow endpoint, allowing an attacker to delete arbitrary files from the filesystem. This issue arises due to improper input validation, enabling the attacker to manipulate file paths and delete sensitive files outside of the intended directory.

From the GitHub advisory

A path traversal vulnerability exists in the modelscope/agentscope application, affecting all versions. The vulnerability is present in the /delete-workflow endpoint, allowing an attacker to delete arbitrary files from the filesystem. This issue arises due to improper input validation, enabling the attacker to manipulate file paths and delete sensitive files outside of the intended directory.

Weakness type: CWE-29, CWE-22.

Product: agentscope (PyPI) · Assigned by: @huntr_ai · Published: 2025-03-20

Affected and fixed versions

EcosystemPackageVulnerableFirst fixed
PyPIagentscope<= 0.1.1none listed
VendorProductAffected versions (per CVE record)
modelscopemodelscope/agentscopeunspecified <= latest

Severity scores

Scored byCVSSScoreVector
@huntr_ai3.09.1 CriticalCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
GitHub3.19.1 CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
  • Attack vector: network (remotely reachable)
  • Attack complexity: low
  • Privileges required: none (no login)
  • User interaction: none
  • Scope: unchanged

CVSS measures how bad a flaw is if exploited, not how likely exploitation is. Read it next to the exploitation data below.

Exploitation and urgency

  • CISA KEV: not listed (no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation known to CISA).
  • CISA SSVC assessment: exploitation poc, automatable yes, technical impact partial.
  • FIRST EPSS (model of 2026-10-21): 1.04% probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 64.

Timeline

  • — CVE record last updated
  • — CVE record published by @huntr_ai
  • — GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-c4cc-w454-4634 published (critical)

Sources and references

Original sources first. Version and fix details should always be confirmed against the vendor or project advisory.

Vulnerability records

  1. GitHub Advisory GHSA-c4cc-w454-4634 github.com
  2. CVE.org record CVE-2024-8537 cve.org
  3. NVD entry CVE-2024-8537 nvd.nist.gov

Other references from the CVE record and advisory

  1. huntr.com huntr.com
  2. github.com github.com
  3. github.com github.com
  4. github.com github.com

Critical PyPI advisories · Today’s Security Digest