Security Digest · Vulnerability record

CVE-2025-1750: LlamaIndex DuckDBVectorStore vulnerable to SQL injection through ref_doc_id

An SQL injection vulnerability exists in the delete function of DuckDBVectorStore in run-llama/llamaindex version v0.12.19.

CVSS 9.8 Critical EPSS 0.8% · p57

Should you act?

Critical and remotely reachable

No known exploitation yet, but it is network-reachable without credentials. This signal is computed from CISA KEV, EPSS and CVSS data; it is not an editorial verdict.

  • Not in CISA KEV, but CISA’s SSVC assessment records a public proof-of-concept, so attack code exists.
  • EPSS 0.8%, percentile 57: FIRST’s model estimates a 0.8% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 57% of all scored CVEs (moderate). EPSS is a probability, not a verdict.
  • Remotely reachable with no login and no user interaction. If the vulnerable service is exposed to the internet, prioritize it.
  • Only applies if your dependency tree includes llama-index-vector-stores-duckdb (PyPI) >= 0.12.19, < 0.12.21, fixed in 0.12.21. Check your lockfile, including transitive dependencies.

What it is

An SQL injection vulnerability exists in the delete function of DuckDBVectorStore in run-llama/llamaindex version v0.12.19. This vulnerability allows an attacker to manipulate the refdocid parameter, enabling them to read and write arbitrary files on the server, potentially leading to remote code execution (RCE).

From the GitHub advisory

An SQL injection vulnerability exists in the delete function of DuckDBVectorStore in run-llama/llamaindex version v0.12.19. This vulnerability allows an attacker to manipulate the refdocid parameter, enabling them to read and write arbitrary files on the server, potentially leading to remote code execution (RCE).

Weakness type: CWE-89.

Product: llama-index-vector-stores-duckdb (PyPI) · Assigned by: @huntr_ai · Published: 2025-06-02

Affected and fixed versions

EcosystemPackageVulnerableFirst fixed
PyPIllama-index-vector-stores-duckdb>= 0.12.19, < 0.12.210.12.21
VendorProductAffected versions (per CVE record)
run-llamarun-llama/llama_indexunspecified < 0.3.1

Severity scores

Scored byCVSSScoreVector
@huntr_ai3.09.8 CriticalCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
GitHub3.19.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
  • Attack vector: network (remotely reachable)
  • Attack complexity: low
  • Privileges required: none (no login)
  • User interaction: none
  • Scope: unchanged

CVSS measures how bad a flaw is if exploited, not how likely exploitation is. Read it next to the exploitation data below.

Exploitation and urgency

  • CISA KEV: not listed (no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation known to CISA).
  • CISA SSVC assessment: exploitation poc, automatable yes, technical impact total.
  • FIRST EPSS (model of 2026-10-21): 0.82% probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 57.

Timeline

  • — CVE record last updated
  • — CVE record published by @huntr_ai
  • — GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-6mcc-q3mg-3qg6 published (critical)

Sources and references

Original sources first. Version and fix details should always be confirmed against the vendor or project advisory.

Vulnerability records

  1. GitHub Advisory GHSA-6mcc-q3mg-3qg6 github.com
  2. CVE.org record CVE-2025-1750 cve.org
  3. NVD entry CVE-2025-1750 nvd.nist.gov

Other references from the CVE record and advisory

  1. huntr.com huntr.com
  2. github.com github.com
  3. github.com github.com
  4. github.com github.com

Critical PyPI advisories · Today’s Security Digest