Security Digest · Vulnerability record

CVE-2025-59377: mcp-kubernetes-server has an OS Command Injection vulnerability

feiskyer mcp-kubernetes-server through 0.1.11 allows OS command injection, even in read-only mode, via /mcp/kubectl because shell=True is used.

CVSS 3.7 Low EPSS 1.2% · p68

Should you act?

Normal patch cycle

No exploitation signal; fix it in your next routine update if you are affected. This signal is computed from CISA KEV, EPSS and CVSS data; it is not an editorial verdict.

  • Not in CISA KEV, but CISA’s SSVC assessment records a public proof-of-concept, so attack code exists.
  • EPSS 1.2%, percentile 68: FIRST’s model estimates a 1.2% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 68% of all scored CVEs (moderate). EPSS is a probability, not a verdict.
  • Remotely reachable with no login and no user interaction. If the vulnerable service is exposed to the internet, prioritize it.
  • Only applies if your dependency tree includes mcp-kubernetes-server (PyPI) <= 0.1.11, no fixed version listed. Check your lockfile, including transitive dependencies.

What it is

feiskyer mcp-kubernetes-server through 0.1.11 allows OS command injection, even in read-only mode, via /mcp/kubectl because shell=True is used. NOTE: this is unrelated to mcp-server-kubernetes and CVE-2025-53355.

From the GitHub advisory

feiskyer/mcp-kubernetes-server through 0.1.11 allows OS command injection via the /mcp/kubectl endpoint. The handler constructs a shell command with user-supplied arguments and executes it with subprocess using shell=True, enabling injection through shell metacharacters (e.g., ;, &&, $()), even when the server is running in read-only mode.

A remote, unauthenticated attacker can execute arbitrary OS commands on the host, resulting in full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

This issue is distinct from mcp-server-kubernetes and from CVE-2025-53355.

Weakness type: CWE-78.

Product: mcp-kubernetes-server (PyPI) · Assigned by: mitre · Published: 2025-09-15

Affected and fixed versions

EcosystemPackageVulnerableFirst fixed
PyPImcp-kubernetes-server<= 0.1.11none listed
VendorProductAffected versions (per CVE record)
feiskyermcp-kubernetes-server<= 0.1.11

Severity scores

Scored byCVSSScoreVector
mitre3.13.7 LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
GitHub3.19.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
  • Attack vector: network (remotely reachable)
  • Attack complexity: high (needs special conditions)
  • Privileges required: none (no login)
  • User interaction: none
  • Scope: unchanged

CVSS measures how bad a flaw is if exploited, not how likely exploitation is. Read it next to the exploitation data below.

Exploitation and urgency

  • CISA KEV: not listed (no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation known to CISA).
  • CISA SSVC assessment: exploitation poc, automatable no, technical impact partial.
  • FIRST EPSS (model of 2026-10-21): 1.20% probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 68.

Timeline

  • — CVE record last updated
  • — CVE record published by mitre
  • — GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-4hqq-7q79-932p published (critical)

Sources and references

Original sources first. Version and fix details should always be confirmed against the vendor or project advisory.

Vulnerability records

  1. GitHub Advisory GHSA-4hqq-7q79-932p github.com
  2. CVE.org record CVE-2025-59377 cve.org
  3. NVD entry CVE-2025-59377 nvd.nist.gov

Other references from the CVE record and advisory

  1. github.com github.com
  2. github.com github.com
  3. tenable.com tenable.com

Critical PyPI advisories · Today’s Security Digest