Security Digest · Vulnerability record

CVE-2026-41296: OpenClaw: Sandbox escape via TOCTOU race in remote FS bridge readFile

OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains a time-of-check-time-of-use race condition in the remote filesystem bridge readFile function that allows sandbox escape.

CVSS 8.8 High EPSS 0.3% · p24

Should you act?

Normal patch cycle

No exploitation signal; fix it in your next routine update if you are affected. This signal is computed from CISA KEV, EPSS and CVSS data; it is not an editorial verdict.

  • No confirmed exploitation. It is not in CISA’s KEV catalog and CISA’s SSVC assessment records no known exploitation. That can change quickly after a public write-up; re-check if you are affected.
  • EPSS 0.3%, percentile 24: FIRST’s model estimates a 0.3% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 24% of all scored CVEs (low). EPSS is a probability, not a verdict.
  • Needs an account (low (any account)). Exposure depends on who can log in.
  • Only applies if your dependency tree includes openclaw (npm) <= 2026.3.28, fixed in 2026.3.31. Check your lockfile, including transitive dependencies.

What it is

OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains a time-of-check-time-of-use race condition in the remote filesystem bridge readFile function that allows sandbox escape. Attackers can exploit the separate path validation and file read operations to bypass sandbox restrictions and read arbitrary files.

From the GitHub advisory

Summary Sandbox escape via TOCTOU race in remote FS bridge readFile

Current Maintainer Triage - Normalized severity: critical - Assessment: v2026.3.28 remote sandbox reads still do path-check then separate file read, so the TOCTOU sandbox escape remains present in the latest shipped tag.

Affected Packages / Versions - Package: openclaw (npm) - Latest published npm version: 2026.3.31 - Vulnerable version range: = 2026.3.31 - First stable tag containing the fix: v2026.3.31

Fix Commit(s) - 121870a08583033ed6a0ed73d9ffea32991252bb — 2026-03-31T09:55:51+09:00

OpenClaw thanks @AntAISecurityLab for reporting.

Weakness type: CWE-367.

Product: openclaw (npm) · Assigned by: VulnCheck · Published: 2026-04-20

Affected and fixed versions

EcosystemPackageVulnerableFirst fixed
npmopenclaw<= 2026.3.282026.3.31
VendorProductAffected versions (per CVE record)
OpenClawOpenClaw< 2026.3.31

Severity scores

Scored byCVSSScoreVector
VulnCheck4.08.8 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N
VulnCheck3.18.2 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
GitHub4.09.4 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
  • Attack vector: network (remotely reachable)
  • Attack complexity: high (needs special conditions)
  • Attack requirements: none
  • Privileges required: low (any account)
  • User interaction: none

CVSS measures how bad a flaw is if exploited, not how likely exploitation is. Read it next to the exploitation data below.

Exploitation and urgency

  • CISA KEV: not listed (no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation known to CISA).
  • CISA SSVC assessment: exploitation none, automatable no, technical impact total.
  • FIRST EPSS (model of 2026-10-21): 0.33% probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 24.

Timeline

  • — GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-9p3r-hh9g-5cmg published (critical)
  • — CVE record published by VulnCheck
  • — CVE record last updated

Sources and references

Original sources first. Version and fix details should always be confirmed against the vendor or project advisory.

Vendor and project advisories, patches

  1. GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-9p3r-hh9g-5cmg) github.com
  2. Patch Commit github.com

Vulnerability records

  1. GitHub Advisory GHSA-9p3r-hh9g-5cmg github.com
  2. CVE.org record CVE-2026-41296 cve.org
  3. NVD entry CVE-2026-41296 nvd.nist.gov

Other references from the CVE record and advisory

  1. VulnCheck Advisory: OpenClaw < 2026.3.31 - Sandbox Escape via TOCTOU Race in Remote FS Bridge readFile vulncheck.com
  2. github.com github.com

Critical npm advisories · Today’s Security Digest