Security Digest · Vulnerability record

CVE-2026-55447: Langflow: BaseFileComponent-based nodes arbitrary file read with RCE exploit

Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows.

CVSS 9.6 Critical EPSS 0.7% · p51

Should you act?

Critical and remotely reachable

No known exploitation yet, but it is network-reachable without credentials. This signal is computed from CISA KEV, EPSS and CVSS data; it is not an editorial verdict.

  • No confirmed exploitation. It is not in CISA’s KEV catalog and CISA’s SSVC assessment records no known exploitation. That can change quickly after a public write-up; re-check if you are affected.
  • EPSS 0.7%, percentile 51: FIRST’s model estimates a 0.7% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 51% of all scored CVEs (moderate). EPSS is a probability, not a verdict.
  • Needs a user to click or open something. Phishing makes that realistic, but it is not wormable.
  • Only applies if your dependency tree includes langflow (PyPI) < 1.9.2, fixed in 1.9.2. Check your lockfile, including transitive dependencies.

What it is

Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Prior to 1.9.2, by controlling a files that are digested into the RAG, an attacker can direct the node to read any file on the file-system by absolute path. All components based on BaseFileComponent are vulnerable to the vulnerability. This includes Docling (DoclingInlineComponent), Docling Serve, DoclingRemoteComponent), Read File (FileComponent), NVIDIA Retriever Extraction (NvidiaIngestComponent), Video File (VideoFileComponent), and Unstructured API (UnstructuredComponent). This vulnerability is fixed in 1.9.2.

From the GitHub advisory

Summary All components based on BaseFileComponent are vulnerable to the following vulnerability: 1. Docling (DoclingInlineComponent) 2. Docling Serve (DoclingRemoteComponent) 3. Read File (FileComponent) 4. NVIDIA Retriever Extraction (NvidiaIngestComponent) 5. Video File (VideoFileComponent) 6. Unstructured API (UnstructuredComponent)

For clarity, from now on I'll only refer to Read File component.

The Read File node processes user-controlled files. Example scenario is a RAG chatbot - a system that allows users of an organization to ask questions about documents saved in the organizations.

By controlling a files that are digested into the RAG, an attacker can direct the node to read any file on the file-system by absolute path.

Using this vulnerability an attacker can acheive RCE: 1. Upload a file that directs the node to read Langflow's secretkey file containing the JWT token secret. 2. This would allow the attacker then to simply task the Chatbot for the JWT secret. 3. Using this secret, the attacker then crafts a JWT token for any user-id, bypassing authentication. 4. Code execution is then trivial - simply create a new flow with "Python Interpreter" node, fill it with arbitrary Python code and execute it.

Weakness type: CWE-61, CWE-200.

Product: langflow (PyPI) · Assigned by: GitHub_M · Published: 2026-06-23

Affected and fixed versions

EcosystemPackageVulnerableFirst fixed
PyPIlangflow< 1.9.21.9.2
VendorProductAffected versions (per CVE record)
langflow-ailangflow< 1.9.2

Severity scores

Scored byCVSSScoreVector
GitHub_M3.19.6 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
GitHub3.19.6 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
  • Attack vector: network (remotely reachable)
  • Attack complexity: low
  • Privileges required: none (no login)
  • User interaction: required (a user must click/open something)
  • Scope: changed (can affect other components)

CVSS measures how bad a flaw is if exploited, not how likely exploitation is. Read it next to the exploitation data below.

Exploitation and urgency

  • CISA KEV: not listed (no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation known to CISA).
  • CISA SSVC assessment: exploitation none, automatable no, technical impact total.
  • FIRST EPSS (model of 2026-10-21): 0.66% probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 51.

Timeline

  • — GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-ccv6-r384-xp75 published (critical)
  • — CVE record published by GitHub_M
  • — CVE record last updated

Sources and references

Original sources first. Version and fix details should always be confirmed against the vendor or project advisory.

Vulnerability records

  1. GitHub Advisory GHSA-ccv6-r384-xp75 github.com
  2. CVE.org record CVE-2026-55447 cve.org
  3. NVD entry CVE-2026-55447 nvd.nist.gov

Other references from the CVE record and advisory

  1. github.com github.com
  2. github.com github.com

Critical PyPI advisories · Today’s Security Digest