Security Digest · Vulnerability record

CVE-2026-58399: @acastellon/auth: Authentication bypass via spoofable headers in validateToken()

@acastellon/auth is an authentication control system for microservices.

CVSS 8.7 High EPSS 1.0% · p62

Should you act?

Normal patch cycle

No exploitation signal; fix it in your next routine update if you are affected. This signal is computed from CISA KEV, EPSS and CVSS data; it is not an editorial verdict.

  • No confirmed exploitation. It is not in CISA’s KEV catalog and CISA’s SSVC assessment records no known exploitation. That can change quickly after a public write-up; re-check if you are affected.
  • EPSS 1.0%, percentile 62: FIRST’s model estimates a 1.0% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 62% of all scored CVEs (moderate). EPSS is a probability, not a verdict.
  • Remotely reachable with no login and no user interaction. If the vulnerable service is exposed to the internet, prioritize it.
  • Only applies if your dependency tree includes @acastellon/auth (npm) < 2.3.0, fixed in 2.3.0. Check your lockfile, including transitive dependencies.

What it is

@acastellon/auth is an authentication control system for microservices. Versions prior to 2.3.0 appear to allow an unauthenticated authentication bypass in validateToken() through spoofable auth-user and Host request headers. The validateToken middleware contains a service-to-service bypass for auth-user: service-brother when req.get('host').startsWith(getHostName()). Both values involved in the check can be influenced by an unauthenticated HTTP client: auth-user is a request header, and Host is also client-controlled. As a result, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send a request with crafted headers and bypass token validation before the normal legacy/JWT/OIDC validation logic runs. A fix has been implemented in v2.3.0.

From the GitHub advisory

@acastellon/auth v2.2.0 appears to allow an unauthenticated authentication bypass in validateToken() through spoofable auth-user and Host request headers.

The validateToken middleware contains a service-to-service bypass for auth-user: service-brother when req.get('host').startsWith(getHostName()). Both values involved in the check can be influenced by an unauthenticated HTTP client: auth-user is a request header, and Host is also client-controlled. As a result, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send a request with crafted headers and bypass token validation before the normal legacy/JWT/OIDC validation logic runs.

Impact: An attacker may be able to access routes protected by validateToken() without a valid token. In deployments where downstream services trust auth-user or is- headers, this may also lead to privilege escalation.

Affected package: @acastellon/auth v2.2.0

Affected code: auth.js, validateToken() The issue is related to the service-brother bypass and getHostName() check.

Weakness type: CWE-287, CWE-290.

Product: @acastellon/auth (npm) · Assigned by: GitHub_M · Published: 2026-07-01

Affected and fixed versions

EcosystemPackageVulnerableFirst fixed
npm@acastellon/auth< 2.3.02.3.0
VendorProductAffected versions (per CVE record)
antonio-castellonmodule-auth< 2.3.0

Severity scores

Scored byCVSSScoreVector
GitHub_M4.08.7 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
GitHub4.09.3 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
  • Attack vector: network (remotely reachable)
  • Attack complexity: low
  • Attack requirements: none
  • Privileges required: none (no login)
  • User interaction: none

CVSS measures how bad a flaw is if exploited, not how likely exploitation is. Read it next to the exploitation data below.

Exploitation and urgency

  • CISA KEV: not listed (no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation known to CISA).
  • CISA SSVC assessment: exploitation none, automatable yes, technical impact total.
  • FIRST EPSS (model of 2026-10-21): 0.97% probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 62.

Timeline

  • — GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-gfj5-979r-92pw published (critical)
  • — CVE record published by GitHub_M
  • — CVE record last updated

Sources and references

Original sources first. Version and fix details should always be confirmed against the vendor or project advisory.

Vulnerability records

  1. GitHub Advisory GHSA-gfj5-979r-92pw github.com
  2. CVE.org record CVE-2026-58399 cve.org
  3. NVD entry CVE-2026-58399 nvd.nist.gov

Other references from the CVE record and advisory

  1. github.com github.com
  2. github.com github.com
  3. npmjs.com npmjs.com

Critical npm advisories · Today’s Security Digest