Security Digest · Vulnerability record

CVE-2026-7302: SGLang's multimodal generation runtime has an unauthenticated path traversal vulnerability

SGLangs multimodal generation runtime is vulnerable to an unauthenticated path traversal vulnerability, allowing an attacker to write arbitrary files anywhere the server process has write access, by including ../ sequences in the upload filename when sent to specific endpoints.

CVSS 9.1 Critical EPSS 0.6% · p47

Should you act?

Critical and remotely reachable

No known exploitation yet, but it is network-reachable without credentials. This signal is computed from CISA KEV, EPSS and CVSS data; it is not an editorial verdict.

  • No confirmed exploitation. It is not in CISA’s KEV catalog and CISA’s SSVC assessment records no known exploitation. That can change quickly after a public write-up; re-check if you are affected.
  • EPSS 0.6%, percentile 47: FIRST’s model estimates a 0.6% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 47% of all scored CVEs (low). EPSS is a probability, not a verdict.
  • Remotely reachable with no login and no user interaction. If the vulnerable service is exposed to the internet, prioritize it.
  • Only applies if your dependency tree includes sglang (PyPI) >= 0.5.5, <= 0.5.12, no fixed version listed. Check your lockfile, including transitive dependencies.

What it is

SGLangs multimodal generation runtime is vulnerable to an unauthenticated path traversal vulnerability, allowing an attacker to write arbitrary files anywhere the server process has write access, by including ../ sequences in the upload filename when sent to specific endpoints.

From the GitHub advisory

SGLang's multimodal generation runtime is vulnerable to an unauthenticated path traversal vulnerability, allowing an attacker to write arbitrary files anywhere the server process has write access, by including ../ sequences in the upload filename when sent to specific endpoints.

Weakness type: CWE-35.

Product: sglang (PyPI) · Assigned by: certcc · Published: 2026-05-18

Affected and fixed versions

EcosystemPackageVulnerableFirst fixed
PyPIsglang>= 0.5.5, <= 0.5.12none listed
VendorProductAffected versions (per CVE record)
SGLangSGLang5.10

Severity scores

Scored byCVSSScoreVector
CISA-ADP3.19.1 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
GitHub3.19.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
  • Attack vector: network (remotely reachable)
  • Attack complexity: low
  • Privileges required: none (no login)
  • User interaction: none
  • Scope: unchanged

CVSS measures how bad a flaw is if exploited, not how likely exploitation is. Read it next to the exploitation data below.

Exploitation and urgency

  • CISA KEV: not listed (no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation known to CISA).
  • CISA SSVC assessment: exploitation none, automatable yes, technical impact partial.
  • FIRST EPSS (model of 2026-10-21): 0.58% probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 47.

Timeline

  • — CVE record last updated
  • — CVE record published by certcc
  • — GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-qwrp-wghp-94q2 published (critical)

Sources and references

Original sources first. Version and fix details should always be confirmed against the vendor or project advisory.

Vulnerability records

  1. GitHub Advisory GHSA-qwrp-wghp-94q2 github.com
  2. CVE.org record CVE-2026-7302 cve.org
  3. NVD entry CVE-2026-7302 nvd.nist.gov

Other references from the CVE record and advisory

  1. github.com github.com
  2. antiproof.ai antiproof.ai

Critical PyPI advisories · Today’s Security Digest