Security Digest · Vulnerability record

CVE-2026-73420: Auth.js: Email normalizer validates the address before Unicode normalization, allowing a homoglyph @ bypass

NextAuth.js provides authentication for Next.js.

CVSS 9.1 Critical EPSS 0.7% · p53

Should you act?

Critical and remotely reachable

No known exploitation yet, but it is network-reachable without credentials. This signal is computed from CISA KEV, EPSS and CVSS data; it is not an editorial verdict.

  • No confirmed exploitation. It is not in CISA’s KEV catalog and CISA’s SSVC assessment records no known exploitation. That can change quickly after a public write-up; re-check if you are affected.
  • EPSS 0.7%, percentile 53: FIRST’s model estimates a 0.7% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 53% of all scored CVEs (moderate). EPSS is a probability, not a verdict.
  • Remotely reachable with no login and no user interaction. If the vulnerable service is exposed to the internet, prioritize it.
  • Only applies if your dependency tree includes @auth/core (npm) >= 0.1.0, < 0.41.3, fixed in 0.41.3; next-auth (npm) >= 4.10.3, < 4.24.15, fixed in 4.24.15; next-auth (npm) >= 5.0.0-beta.1, <= 5.0.0-beta.31, fixed in 5.0.0-beta.32. Check your lockfile, including transitive dependencies.

What it is

NextAuth.js provides authentication for Next.js. Prior to @auth/core 0.41.3 and next-auth 4.24.15 and 5.0.0-beta.32, the defaultNormalizer used by the email and magic-link sign-in flow validates an address before applying Unicode normalization. An address can contain a Unicode character such as U+FF20 FULLWIDTH COMMERCIAL AT that is not ASCII at-sign but canonicalizes to an ASCII at-sign under NFKC or NFKD normalization. The address passes the normalizer's single-at-sign check, but a downstream sendVerificationRequest mail library or delivery service that normalizes the address can then see two at-sign separators and deliver the passwordless sign-in link to an attacker-controlled recipient. Applications are affected when the email provider uses the built-in normalizer rather than a custom normalizeIdentifier and the downstream sender applies Unicode normalization. An attacker who knows a victim's email address can request the misrouted magic link and sign in as the victim without victim interaction. This issue is fixed in @auth/core 0.41.3 and next-auth 4.24.15 and 5.0.0-beta.32.

From the GitHub advisory

Summary

The default email-address normalizer used by the email/magic-link sign-in flow validates the address before applying Unicode normalization. An address can contain a Unicode character that is not an ASCII @ (U+0040) but canonicalizes to one under NFKC/NFKD normalization (the normalization commonly applied by mail libraries and services for internationalized email). Such an address passes the normalizer's single-@ check, but a downstream mail library that normalizes the string then sees two @ separators and may deliver the passwordless sign-in link to a different recipient than intended. This is an instance of validating before canonicalizing.

Am I affected?

You may be affected if all of the following hold:

- You use next-auth >= 4.0.0, = 0.1.0,

Weakness type: CWE-180.

Product: @auth/core (npm) · Assigned by: GitHub_M · Published: 2026-08-13

Affected and fixed versions

EcosystemPackageVulnerableFirst fixed
npm@auth/core>= 0.1.0, < 0.41.30.41.3
npmnext-auth>= 4.10.3, < 4.24.154.24.15
npmnext-auth>= 5.0.0-beta.1, <= 5.0.0-beta.315.0.0-beta.32
VendorProductAffected versions (per CVE record)
nextauthjsnext-auth< 4.24.15, >= 5.0.0-beta.4, < 5.0.0-beta.32
@authcore>= 0.1.0, < 0.41.3

Severity scores

Scored byCVSSScoreVector
GitHub_M4.09.1 CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
GitHub4.09.1 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
  • Attack vector: network (remotely reachable)
  • Attack complexity: low
  • Attack requirements: present (depends on deployment conditions)
  • Privileges required: none (no login)
  • User interaction: none

CVSS measures how bad a flaw is if exploited, not how likely exploitation is. Read it next to the exploitation data below.

Exploitation and urgency

  • CISA KEV: not listed (no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation known to CISA).
  • CISA SSVC assessment: exploitation none, automatable yes, technical impact total.
  • FIRST EPSS (model of 2026-10-21): 0.73% probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 53.

Timeline

  • — GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-7rqj-j65f-68wh published (critical)
  • — CVE record published by GitHub_M
  • — CVE record last updated

Sources and references

Original sources first. Version and fix details should always be confirmed against the vendor or project advisory.

Vulnerability records

  1. GitHub Advisory GHSA-7rqj-j65f-68wh github.com
  2. CVE.org record CVE-2026-73420 cve.org
  3. NVD entry CVE-2026-73420 nvd.nist.gov

Other references from the CVE record and advisory

  1. github.com github.com
  2. github.com github.com
  3. github.com github.com
  4. github.com github.com
  5. github.com github.com
  6. github.com github.com

Critical npm advisories · Today’s Security Digest