Security Digest · Vulnerability record
CVE-2026-73420: Auth.js: Email normalizer validates the address before Unicode normalization, allowing a homoglyph @ bypass
NextAuth.js provides authentication for Next.js.
CVSS 9.1 Critical EPSS 0.7% · p53
Should you act?
Critical and remotely reachable
No known exploitation yet, but it is network-reachable without credentials. This signal is computed from CISA KEV, EPSS and CVSS data; it is not an editorial verdict.
- No confirmed exploitation. It is not in CISA’s KEV catalog and CISA’s SSVC assessment records no known exploitation. That can change quickly after a public write-up; re-check if you are affected.
- EPSS 0.7%, percentile 53: FIRST’s model estimates a 0.7% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 53% of all scored CVEs (moderate). EPSS is a probability, not a verdict.
- Remotely reachable with no login and no user interaction. If the vulnerable service is exposed to the internet, prioritize it.
- Only applies if your dependency tree includes
@auth/core(npm) >= 0.1.0, < 0.41.3, fixed in 0.41.3;next-auth(npm) >= 4.10.3, < 4.24.15, fixed in 4.24.15;next-auth(npm) >= 5.0.0-beta.1, <= 5.0.0-beta.31, fixed in 5.0.0-beta.32. Check your lockfile, including transitive dependencies.
What it is
NextAuth.js provides authentication for Next.js. Prior to @auth/core 0.41.3 and next-auth 4.24.15 and 5.0.0-beta.32, the defaultNormalizer used by the email and magic-link sign-in flow validates an address before applying Unicode normalization. An address can contain a Unicode character such as U+FF20 FULLWIDTH COMMERCIAL AT that is not ASCII at-sign but canonicalizes to an ASCII at-sign under NFKC or NFKD normalization. The address passes the normalizer's single-at-sign check, but a downstream sendVerificationRequest mail library or delivery service that normalizes the address can then see two at-sign separators and deliver the passwordless sign-in link to an attacker-controlled recipient. Applications are affected when the email provider uses the built-in normalizer rather than a custom normalizeIdentifier and the downstream sender applies Unicode normalization. An attacker who knows a victim's email address can request the misrouted magic link and sign in as the victim without victim interaction. This issue is fixed in @auth/core 0.41.3 and next-auth 4.24.15 and 5.0.0-beta.32.
From the GitHub advisory
Summary
The default email-address normalizer used by the email/magic-link sign-in flow validates the address before applying Unicode normalization. An address can contain a Unicode character that is not an ASCII @ (U+0040) but canonicalizes to one under NFKC/NFKD normalization (the normalization commonly applied by mail libraries and services for internationalized email). Such an address passes the normalizer's single-@ check, but a downstream mail library that normalizes the string then sees two @ separators and may deliver the passwordless sign-in link to a different recipient than intended. This is an instance of validating before canonicalizing.
Am I affected?
You may be affected if all of the following hold:
- You use next-auth >= 4.0.0, = 0.1.0,
Weakness type: CWE-180.
Product: @auth/core (npm) · Assigned by: GitHub_M · Published: 2026-08-13
Affected and fixed versions
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable | First fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | @auth/core | >= 0.1.0, < 0.41.3 | 0.41.3 |
| npm | next-auth | >= 4.10.3, < 4.24.15 | 4.24.15 |
| npm | next-auth | >= 5.0.0-beta.1, <= 5.0.0-beta.31 | 5.0.0-beta.32 |
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions (per CVE record) |
|---|---|---|
| nextauthjs | next-auth | < 4.24.15, >= 5.0.0-beta.4, < 5.0.0-beta.32 |
| @auth | core | >= 0.1.0, < 0.41.3 |
Severity scores
| Scored by | CVSS | Score | Vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub_M | 4.0 | 9.1 Critical | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N |
| GitHub | 4.0 | 9.1 | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N |
- Attack vector: network (remotely reachable)
- Attack complexity: low
- Attack requirements: present (depends on deployment conditions)
- Privileges required: none (no login)
- User interaction: none
CVSS measures how bad a flaw is if exploited, not how likely exploitation is. Read it next to the exploitation data below.
Exploitation and urgency
- CISA KEV: not listed (no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation known to CISA).
- CISA SSVC assessment: exploitation none, automatable yes, technical impact total.
- FIRST EPSS (model of 2026-10-21): 0.73% probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 53.
Timeline
- — GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-7rqj-j65f-68wh published (critical)
- — CVE record published by GitHub_M
- — CVE record last updated
Sources and references
Original sources first. Version and fix details should always be confirmed against the vendor or project advisory.
Vulnerability records
- GitHub Advisory GHSA-7rqj-j65f-68wh github.com
- CVE.org record CVE-2026-73420 cve.org
- NVD entry CVE-2026-73420 nvd.nist.gov
Other references from the CVE record and advisory
- github.com github.com
- github.com github.com
- github.com github.com
- github.com github.com
- github.com github.com
- github.com github.com